Learning evaluation models are crucial for educators, trainers, and organizations in assessing the effectiveness of educational programs and initiatives. These models enable us to measure the impact of training on an individual’s performance and on organizational outcomes. Let’s look at four popular learning evaluation models that can be used in various settings.
1.Kirkpatrick’s Four-Level Training Evaluation Model
Donald Kirkpatrick’s model is the most widely used and recognized approach to training evaluation. It consists of four levels:
– Reaction: This level measures how the learners reacted to the training. Did they find it useful? Was it well-received?
– Learning: At this stage, the assessment determines what the learners have actually learned. This can be measured through tests and assessments before and after the training.
– Behavior: This level involves evaluating if there’s been a change in behavior due to the training when participants return to their jobs or daily activities.
– Results: The final level examines outcomes. Has there been an improvement in performance? Are there quantifiable results such as increased production, improved quality, or decreased costs?
2.The ADDIE Model
ADDIE stands for Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation, and Evaluation. It is more of a framework for creating effective training programs rather than just an evaluation model.
– Analysis: Determine the needs and constraints.
– Design: Establish learning objectives and choose content delivery methods.
– Development: Create the course materials.
– Implementation: Carry out or deliver the training program.
– Evaluation: Involves two parts: formative evaluation, which occurs at each stage of the process, and summative evaluation, which takes place after implementation to judge its effectiveness.
3.Anderson’s Model of Learning Evaluation
Lorin W. Anderson developed a revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy that is aimed at reflecting a more active form of thinking and is perhaps more accurate for modern education.
It emphasizes three dimensions of educational outcomes:
1.a) Knowledge (recall data),
2.b) Skills (apply knowledge),
3.c) Attitude (change or develop attitudes/beliefs).
4.CIRO (Context, Input, Reaction, Outcome) Model
CIRO is focused on evaluating the efficiency and effectiveness of a learning program by looking at:
– Context: What are the objectives? What is the environment like?
– Input: What resources are needed? What is the quality of these resources?
– Reaction: Similar to Kirkpatrick’s first level, this assesses participants’ reactions after completing the training.
– Outcome: Looking at what has been achieved as a result of the training program.
These learning evaluation models provide frameworks that can guide educators and organizational leaders in measuring and analyzing the fruits of their educational efforts. Whichever model you choose could depend on factors like your specific goals, resources available, and nature of your training program or educational initiative.
4 Learning Evaluation Models You Can Use
Learning evaluation models are crucial for educators, trainers, and organizations in assessing the effectiveness of educational programs and initiatives. These models enable us to measure the impact of training on an individual’s performance and on organizational outcomes. Let’s look at four popular learning evaluation models that can be used in various settings.
1.Kirkpatrick’s Four-Level Training Evaluation Model
Donald Kirkpatrick’s model is the most widely used and recognized approach to training evaluation. It consists of four levels:
– Reaction: This level measures how the learners reacted to the training. Did they find it useful? Was it well-received?
– Learning: At this stage, the assessment determines what the learners have actually learned. This can be measured through tests and assessments before and after the training.
– Behavior: This level involves evaluating if there’s been a change in behavior due to the training when participants return to their jobs or daily activities.
– Results: The final level examines outcomes. Has there been an improvement in performance? Are there quantifiable results such as increased production, improved quality, or decreased costs?
2.The ADDIE Model
ADDIE stands for Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation, and Evaluation. It is more of a framework for creating effective training programs rather than just an evaluation model.
– Analysis: Determine the needs and constraints.
– Design: Establish learning objectives and choose content delivery methods.
– Development: Create the course materials.
– Implementation: Carry out or deliver the training program.
– Evaluation: Involves two parts: formative evaluation, which occurs at each stage of the process, and summative evaluation, which takes place after implementation to judge its effectiveness.
3.Anderson’s Model of Learning Evaluation
Lorin W. Anderson developed a revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy that is aimed at reflecting a more active form of thinking and is perhaps more accurate for modern education.
It emphasizes three dimensions of educational outcomes:
1.a) Knowledge (recall data),
2.b) Skills (apply knowledge),
3.c) Attitude (change or develop attitudes/beliefs).
4.CIRO (Context, Input, Reaction, Outcome) Model
CIRO is focused on evaluating the efficiency and effectiveness of a learning program by looking at:
– Context: What are the objectives? What is the environment like?
– Input: What resources are needed? What is the quality of these resources?
– Reaction: Similar to Kirkpatrick’s first level, this assesses participants’ reactions after completing the training.
– Outcome: Looking at what has been achieved as a result of the training program.
These learning evaluation models provide frameworks that can guide educators and organizational leaders in measuring and analyzing the fruits of their educational efforts. Whichever model you choose could depend on factors like your specific goals, resources available, and nature of your training program or educational initiative.
Post author
Comments
More posts